Sunday, March 18, 2012

If it's popular it can't be good art ...? Discuss

David Hockney painting The Road to Thwing, Late Spring.
© David Hockney/Photograph by Jean-Pierre Gonçalves de Lima/Thames & Hudson
Today we braved the crowds which have been packing the Royal Academy's exhibition David Hockney: A bigger picture.  And it certainly was worth it.
I have been a fan of Hockney's work since the 60s, and have avidly followed what he has been exploring.  I find him to be an exciting thinker about visual art, constantly curious and stimulating my own thoughts about how we see.  He has the enthusiastic outlook and energy of Picasso, never failing to excite wonder and observation in me.
There has been an incredible amount of publicity for this exhibition, in book form and in reviews (listed on Hockney's website), and the show has therefore turned out to be the kind of  blockbuster one would expect for a Monet or Van Gogh.
The exhibition starts with a room of landscapes from Hockney's early work, just to prove that he hasn't suddenly 'discovered' landscape.  He has always been interested in looking, and this becomes stunningly obvious when we reach his first paintings from life.  This room is full of joy: seeing, looking, ... the opportunity not only to see the development of growth within a landscape, but also realisation of the joy of intense observation.  The difference between the first Yorkshire landscapes which were painted from memory and the landscapes done from life is exhilarating.
Particular details which struck me included the sculptural qualities of his paintings of hawthorn bushes.  At present around us the blackthorn bushes are in blossom, and from a distance the edges of fields seem to be blocked out with white patches, and yet, when approached close to the intricacy of the lace-like construct of the sprays of blossom flowers is exquisite.
Another aspect which delights me is the attention to the details of roadside plants and those on the ground below the trees and hedgerows.  Hockney is looking everywhere - the ground in many paintings may appear to be 'filled in' in places, but he notices what it is that is growing or lying there, and lets us notice it too.
The charcoal drawings are beautiful.  These are the starting points for the paintings, and remind us of the landscape heritage onto which Hockney builds.  The ipad drawings come out of this great drawing skill that Hockney has always shown.  Anyone who can wield a stick of charcoal like this can work with an ipad - once again it is the looking, seeing, and eye-hand communication that matters.  The ipad is just the tool.  The ipad simply conflates sketchbook and paint, and facilitates enlargement without further work being necessary.  It does not provide any artistic magic - the artist does that.
One of Hockney's Yosemite multi ipad drawings (each one consists of six pieces together)
The most magical moment for me was in the room containing the multi-part ipad drawings of Yosemite park.  It just happened that I was totally alone for several minutes with these tall, close imposing beautiful drawings, and it was awe-inspiring being there with them.  I started thinking about why the feeling was just like being there, and wondered if the fact that they had been drawn small, on the ipad, and then enlarged in scale had something to do with it.  Are sketches done on a comfortable scale for the hand more potent than a re-drawn or re-painted version done with large scale marks? 
David Hockney's intellectual curiosity is another aspect which excites me. The room which contains his explorations of Claude Lorrain's The sermon on the mount from the Frick Museum's collection, is fascinating indeed. This is an interesting link which mentions it amongst many of the other works.
Sometimes critics seem to be suspicious of popularity - as if art can only be good if a small elite can see its worth. But for me I think that an artist's work can be more than individual paintings. I heard someone today say that the trouble was that not one of the paintings was going to stay with her as an outstanding memory. But that is just like our attitude to landscape: it has to be looked at anew each time, noticed, and added to the accumulation of previous noticing. It is the joy of looking which shines out of this exhibition, and the excitement of looking and noting what he sees and how he sees - and trying different ways of noting it - which is so inspiring about Hockney's whole oeuvre.

3 comments:

June said...

Oh, Olga, you got to see this. Oh I'm so glad for you. And thank you for the posting -- as usual, your comments are perceptive and important to me. I was particularly struck by the question you pose about the small iPad drawings being presented large, rather than re-drawn and painted. Really interesting question. I'm reading "A Bigger Message: Conversations wiht DH" and taking notes.

Thanks again for spending the time to record for the rest of us what you saw and thought. I've been a bit swamped of late, so didn't realize this came from you (Pat from NYC provided the URL because of the iPad connection) so I only became aware it was you as I read and started thinking that I recognized the voice.

marja-leena said...

Such a wonderful review about Hockney's show, Olga, how I wish I could see it. I too find Hockney's enthusiastic discoveries, projects and methods are exciting to follow, even though sometimes I don't like everything he does. (I feel the same with some of Picasso's work, for example.) I was surprised how critical some reviewers were of his works on iPads, such as in his recent show in Canada. Don't you just admire his energy at his age!?

Olga said...

June, I'm glad that you are enjoying A Bigger Message. I found it illuminating, and I'm sure that I shall return to it more than once.
The scale thing is something which is still rolling round my brain, and I must try to check out differences when I go to the RA Summer Exhibition which will most likely have some Hockney ipad pieces as well as the 'normal big pictures' by other artists.

Marja-Leena, thanks. I am curious - do you expect to like every piece of work which an artist you admire produces?
As for Hockney's energy, I'm sure that he would say that he cannot do as much as he could when young, but he has assistants to do all the boring bits. Most of all he has the work and the curiosity which gives him the energy. Think about how Matisse was wielding his scissors and ordering his assistants to move the resultant forms around when he was in his wheelchair! It's the boring bits of life which sap the energy increasingly as one gets older.